From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 25 21:23:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kusanagi.boing.com (silver234.mminternet.com [209.241.149.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A2B150DA for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 21:23:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from boing@kusanagi.boing.com) Received: (from boing@localhost) by kusanagi.boing.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id VAA06856; Tue, 25 May 1999 21:23:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from boing) Message-Id: <199905260423.VAA06856@kusanagi.boing.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:23:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Geff Hanoian Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <12073.927692253@zippy.cdrom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 25 May, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Maybe just a suggestion. I will admit that the developers of BSD are EXCELLENT programmers and providing this whole thing for $0. And that's a GREAT thing. But perhaps if those people can't be polite and considerate they shouldn't answer questions, until they've had a mellow out break? I mean, I know it sounds like I'm talking to a bunch of little kids. But, perhaps people that aren't holding on so tight should be the first level of "support" so to speak? Has that been considered? Then perhaps, once there is more information it could be taken to a developer. These people aren't UNIX experts. It's not their fault. If they had enough information to solve the problem on their own, they would. Geff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message