From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Dec 14 17: 8:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CF514C37 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:08:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA10904 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:08:46 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id CAA67266 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:08:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9EE14C37 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:08:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id RAA87058 for freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:08:34 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199912150108.RAA87058@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: The if_detach problem In-Reply-To: <199912142145.VAA34161@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> from Brian Somers at "Dec 14, 1999 09:45:36 pm" To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:08:34 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers writes: > > I'd like to go down this path, any comments? > > Not comments, but my thoughts.... > > Is there a lot to be gained by removing interfaces ? Another example is netgraph. See the SHUTDOWN section of ng_iface(8). It would be more natural that the interface go away when you kill the node. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message