From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 29 16:30: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553C137B694 for ; Mon, 29 May 2000 16:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kwc@world.std.com) Received: from world.std.com (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25645 for ; Mon, 29 May 2000 19:30:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kwc@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA25158; Mon, 29 May 2000 19:29:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 19:29:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200005292329.TAA25158@world.std.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.0-stable, OpenSSH v1 & v2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello... While tracking -ports & -stable (RELENG_4), I notice that we now have 2 versions of OpenSSH, version 1.2.2, which, being in the main source tree, goes into /usr, and from ports, version 2.1.0, which goes into /usr/local. Question: Any idea as to if/when OpenSSH v2 might make it into -stable? Until that time, is there a Right Way to "turn off" OpenSSH v1? Would that be to un-comment the "NO_OPENSSH" line in /etc/make.conf? Is it reasonable to assume that OpenSSH v2 will (should) disappear from ports when/if it goes to the main source tree? Thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message