From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 05:12:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D3091D; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out-01.shaw.ca (smtp-out-01.shaw.ca [64.59.136.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755F926B7; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:12:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=OwXf4AQYS7J10u4+/2kpCX1VHJ+qeA/E1g375LKBsDQ= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=qPvdnsmkR8B3zcLyyZAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by smtp-out-01.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 23:12:30 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29909BEA; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s5J5CT33024535; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.9/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s5J5CSlV024532; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201406190512.s5J5CSlV024532@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Dewayne Geraghty Subject: Re: Requests for port updates In-Reply-To: Message from Dewayne Geraghty of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:57:20 +1000." <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:12:28 -0700 Cc: appleboy.tw@gmail.com, umq@ueo.co.jp, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , cy@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:12:32 -0000 In message <53A26DB0.6060306@heuristicsystems.com.au>, Dewayne Geraghty writes: > Has bugzilla taken on the role of being the repository for update > requests? With gnats, when the synopsis contained port information (eg > mail\opendkim ...) the "issue" was routed directly to the maintainer. > If there is no auto-routing then how is a maintainer to be alerted to a > port request - unless they happen to refer to bugzilla. > > Mailing freebsd-ports just doesn't seem right... but if it is > > mail/opendkim - current PORTVERSION is 2.8.3, while version 2.9.2 has > been available since April and uses --with-lmdb > sysutils/cfengine36 - released today. Modified the VERSION number and > built 3.6.0 cleanly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb) > www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too. Cfengine was updated about five hours ago. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org