From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 30 11:05:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA18172 for current-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:05:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA18153 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:05:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id TAA09470; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:45:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA06418; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:39:58 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm Message-Id: <199601301839.TAA06418@knobel.gun.de> Subject: Re: Linux Netscape 2.0b6a? To: peter@jhome.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 19:39:58 +0100 (MET) Cc: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199601301727.BAA05108@jhome.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Jan 31, 96 01:27:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > The other thing I wonder about sometimes is the time that a Netscape > employee slipped and said with a loose group like FreeBSD it was difficult > to deal with. *sigh* > Reading in between the lines of that (and I've lost the > posting), I wonder if people like BSDI have made a "strategic arrangement" > to get a native version? Unfortunately, I dont think we're in a position > to make Netscape an offer they can't refuse. :-( shit. and offering them a fast developement machine running -stable ? -- andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ - Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de - \/ ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz apsfilter - magic print filter 4lpd >>> knobel is powered by FreeBSD <<<