From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jun 23 23:40:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF4D14CA8 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:40:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA09894; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:40:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.56.19990624003322.00bd5c50@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.56 (Beta) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:35:47 -0600 To: "G. Adam Stanislav" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: PR broken? was Re: Linux not FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990623163535.009abce0@mail.bfm.org> References: <4.2.0.56.19990623130308.00a0e680@localhost> <3.0.6.32.19990623133706.00981e70@mail.bfm.org> <4.2.0.56.19990623080332.00b39730@localhost> <99062307185100.00965@a11.idiotswitch.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 04:35 PM 6/23/99 -0500, G. Adam Stanislav wrote: >However, I am concerned that you keep repeating the exact same ideas If you think this, then you have not been listening. >I believe your discusion would be more effective and more persuasive if you >tried different arguments or different angles of the same argument. I wasn't "arguing;" I was responding in the affirmative to a query. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message