From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 00:35:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434C816A4D7 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA8A43D31 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:35:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBT8ZfYH026060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:35:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.10/8.12.5/Submit) id hBT8ZeSY026059 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:35:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:35:40 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031229083540.GA25932@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <200312281800.37535@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312281800.37535@harrymail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: 5.2RC heavily crashed by kaudiokreator X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:35:48 -0000 > And while I'm here I'd like to emhasize once again that hw.ata.atapi_dma is > not working. Although the sysctl reports it to be 1, "atacontrol mode" and > also dmesg while booting telling me that it's POI4. > After "atacontrol mode 1 udma33 udma33" it's reported to be udma33. > So the line hw.ata.atapi_dma="1" in /boot/loader.conf is useless (I have > checked that when I abort autoboot it really is set before booting) > I posted this several times but never got an answer. Perhaps this should be > solved for 5.2-RELESE dont know about ATAng but in the old ATA code you have to have at least PIO3 capable atapi device to be able to set DMA... sos was strictly against removing this so it could remain in the new ATA - couldnt it be this? > Thanks, > > -Harry