From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 3 23:17:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE75A37B401 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (ip114.bella-vista.sfo.interquest.net [66.199.86.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6965043F93 for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:17:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h746HLmQ001142; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h746HJdl001141; Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:17:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:17:19 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Mats Larsson Message-ID: <20030804061719.GB873@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mats Larsson , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20030802150826.D35850@marvin.sko.mh.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030802150826.D35850@marvin.sko.mh.se> cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: warnpassword and warnexpire in 5.1 login.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:17:29 -0000 On Sat, Aug 02, 2003, Mats Larsson wrote: > > Hello! > > Tried this question to the questions list with no response, perhaps > current is the correct list for questions related to 5.1-RELEASE?? > > I am trying to use warnexpire and warnpassword in login.conf but with no > result, are the warnexpire and warnpassword still used in 5.1 or have they > been superseded with a PAM module in the same way as minpasswordlen and > minpasswordcase?? They're part of the pam_unix PAM module now, but they should still work. I tried them a few months ago, and I don't remember any special steps being necessary. You ran cap_mkdb(1), right?