From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 5 18:10:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA17514 for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA17507 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA00696; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:10:49 -0800 (PST) To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-960226-SNAP now on ftp.freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Mar 1996 15:37:01 PST." <199603052337.PAA08565@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:10:49 -0800 Message-ID: <694.826078249@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > The -current packages are already up there on wcarchive, you just need > to fix the paths in sysinstall to get them! :) Hmmmm. Meaning that there needs to be some gross version-specific hack in sysinstall so that I don't need to keep ping-ponging back and forth between versions for 2.1.x and 2.2-x. Needless to say, I don't like this idea very much. If we're going to be doing this kind of thing as a general rule then we need to go to something more scientific, like ports-${VERSION} and packages-${VERSION} directories, or we need to put ports and packages *under* the release directories and stop offering them at the top in their own hierarchy. The current situation is simply gross. Jordan