From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Feb  9 19:10:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA28739
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 19:10:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA28732;
          Mon, 9 Feb 1998 19:10:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 19:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802100310.TAA28732@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
Subject: Re: ports/5680: crossm68k-1.4 (new port for MC68xxx cross development)
Reply-To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/5680; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, jhicks@atlanta.glenayre.com
Cc:  Subject: Re: ports/5680: crossm68k-1.4 (new port for MC68xxx cross development)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 22:00:09 -0500

 The crossgcc FAQ clearly states that gdb should not be built in the same
 tree because some directories will collide adversely. Also the correct
 way to avoid softlinks is to edit the one-tree.sh script.
 Jerry is aware of this problems and I'm sure he'll provide a fix ASAP,
 meanwhile please don't commit.
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message