From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 13:31:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 49BA916A420; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:31:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:31:08 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org> References: <200511171051.jAHApSWX074582@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511171051.jAHApSWX074582@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/quake2lnx Makefile distinfo pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/quake2lnx/files extra-patch-src_rogue_g__local.h extra-patch-src_rogue_q__shared.c extra-patch-src_xatrix_q__shared.c patch-Makefile patch-src::game::g_phys.c patch-src::linux::gl_glx.c patch-src::linux::rw_in_svgalib.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:31:08 -0000 On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:51:28AM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > [UPDATE] games/quake2lnx: integrate with "quake2-data" > > Changes: > * Integrate with "quake2-data". > * Add OPTIONS (21). > * Clean-up (sort knobs alphabetically, etc.). > * Automatically extract Rogue and Xatrix mission packs. > * Remove ARCH from library names (gamei386.so -> game.so). > Also increases portability (the library name was manually > defined between #ifdefs checking the architecture, and a > #error at the end). > * Change patch names (using "_" instead of "::"), and also some patches. I was under impression that we do not do this for patches already there, this convention typically should be only applied to new patch files. > > PR: ports/87181 > Submitted by: Alejandro Pulver > Approved by: maintainer timeout Edwin, I wish I could say "thanks" for work you've done, but I would appreciate private confirmation mail even in case of "maintainer timeout". This is a complicated port, and such a change is potentially harmful due to its massiveness. Commits like this should probably be done per-piece fashion, otherwise it's really hard to check if nothing got broken. Not to mention that I actually disagree on the number of changes suggested in the PR (and committed by you). I'm not asking for a backout, in fact I realize how annoying it can be when PR hangs in "open" state for a month(s), and I would have probably needed to change PR state to something like "working on it, please be patient", however, I must say I got somewhat frustrated to have to fix all those things that I don't like WRT this commit. ./danfe