From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 24 9:20:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from osiris.ipform.ru (osiris.ipform.ru [212.158.165.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B021437B400 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:19:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from wp2 (localhost.ipform.ru [127.0.0.1]) by osiris.ipform.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0OHJCV40573 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from matrix@ipform.ru) Message-ID: <000901c08629$c674d320$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> From: "Artem Koutchine" To: Subject: Which is the most secure and reliable ftp daemon Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:19:06 +0300 Organization: IP Form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! I just audited my system for security and it came up that i am running inetd ONLY because ftp daemon is needed. I know that thare are many good ftp daemons, but since i never tested any of them in real production environment i don't know which to pick. Please, share your experience with different ftp daemons. I need something very reliable, secure and configurable. Currently i am thinking about wu-ftpd and proftpd, but both of them have history of security flaws. If i find, i could finaly turn off inetd and save myself some RAM and maybe even tighten security. Regards, Artem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message