From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 15:24:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 922ABF4F;
 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D03100C;
 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tuna (p578a4cec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.138.76.236])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 484F63F416;
 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:24:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/188424: emulators/wine build with gcc47 fails
In-Reply-To: <201404101500.s3AF078L013081@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1404101713550.6009@tuna.site>
References: <201404101500.s3AF078L013081@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:24:05 -0000

It looks like you are using lang/gcc47.  Can you please go 
with lang/gcc instead, which is the default/canonical version
of GCC?

What looks odd is that GCC should imply the use of binutils,
and I just confirmed that via reading Mk/Uses/compiler.mk and
Mk/bsd.gcc.mk (which has USE_BINUTILS=yes).

Tijl, do you have an idea?

Lena, can you share the output of "make test-gcc"?

Gerald