From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 10 10:02:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A6016A403; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4658A43D58; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1GXERG-000BLK-2p; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:02:18 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Daichi GOTO In-reply-to: <44FD8B2B.60501@freebsd.org> References: <44B67340.1080405@freebsd.org> <44B74036.6060101@freebsd.org> <20060903170129.GA98917@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060903172033.GA99212@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060904184717.GA41475@xor.obsecurity.org> <44FD8B2B.60501@freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to Daichi GOTO message dated "Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:35:23 +0900." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:02:17 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:02:20 -0000 [...] > Yeah, we have a new patchset to solve above problem I think. any chance that the new unionfs will make it to 6.2? I'm using it, and it's working just fine - as opposed to the unusable one supplied. If not, Daichi GOTO, will you have a new set of patches? union_vfsops.c just changed, for example. thanks, danny