From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:36:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6173D16A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from excelblue@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0079C13C458 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from excelblue@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so8640563nfc for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:36:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=sxF0JvbOGR38UvWEMp5jVv/TcSQ+9pwYb3QDnDPWueu7JUbwGyjzSiTVs1KnURl7OaGfUL9MYOjFClKxnIKnUey0ran0JcUDV4/KjNXP1iEsompK9s4KhEFK6CPzQcxwxeKdSbZJQUHAZBfnw+zpy1AWzRkZG6gwAUkPIGG+H0M= Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr3858839hue.1168207802458; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.155.13 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:10:02 -0800 From: "Mark Lu" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:36:47 -0000 I've read up a few things stating that sysinstall is at its end-of-life and there are plans to replace it. I'm wondering about the reasons or rationale behind this. Even today, sysinstall seems to work extremely well as an easy-to-use, simple, and stable tool for the installation of FreeBSD. None of the features seem limiting or outdated to me. So, why is there a move to find a replacement or something? Software shouldn't be replaced for the sole reason of being old if it works, right? -- Mark Lu