From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Nov 4 17:20:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA25390 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 17:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA25348; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 17:20:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 17:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711050120.RAA25348@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: KATO Takenori Subject: Re: kern/4936: Cyrix CPU detection Reply-To: KATO Takenori Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR kern/4936; it has been noted by GNATS. From: KATO Takenori To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/4936: Cyrix CPU detection Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 10:12:25 +0900 > >Release: FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386 CPU detection code is improved in 2.2.5 / 3.0-current. Many non-Intel CPUs are identified as they are. > + case 0x540: > + strcat(cpu_model, "GXm"); break; > + break; I'm interested in this item. Is GXm CPU compatible with Pentium instruction set? Are its CCRs compatible with 6x86's? ---- KATO Takenori Dept. Earth Planet. Sci., Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, 464-01, Japan PGP public key: finger kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp ------------------- Powered by FreeBSD(98) -------------------