From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 19:36:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D82E612 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.180.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtpauth.utdallas.edu", Issuer "COMODO High-Assurance Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C813B235A for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:36:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkMFADyMpFOBbgogVWdsb2JhbABZg1+qegEBAQEBAQYKhEKWAwQBFwQHAgkHFCiEQgI6gSkaiFWcVYccjwWXVoVijEiBFgSKQINBjgaGOI8/Hw X-IPAS-Result: AkMFADyMpFOBbgogVWdsb2JhbABZg1+qegEBAQEBAQYKhEKWAwQBFwQHAgkHFCiEQgI6gSkaiFWcVYccjwWXVoVijEiBFgSKQINBjgaGOI8/Hw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,516,1400043600"; d="scan'208";a="18604832" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Jun 2014 14:33:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:33:08 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl Reply-To: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Abandoning the sguil ports Message-ID: <60D2B80D848DAD2DD28D45F4@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=1050 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:36:08 -0000 I am the maintainer for security/sguil-server, security/sguil-sensor and security/sguil-client. I am officially abandoning the ports. The security/sguil-server port is not staged. The other two are. The software has a new release out, so all three ports would need to be updated. Furthermore, the developer has changed to github, which drives me nuts. Finally, the ports are not even being used. They don't even have one download according to bsdstats.org. Since ports that aren't staged will go away on 9/1/2014, is there something additional that I would need to do? Or can these ports simply be removed from the tree now? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell