From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 6 00:39:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA22528 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 00:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA22496; Tue, 6 May 1997 00:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from karpen@localhost) by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA25044; Tue, 6 May 1997 09:43:27 +0200 (MET DST) From: Mikael Karpberg Message-Id: <199705060743.JAA25044@ocean.campus.luth.se> Subject: Re: divert still broken? To: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 09:43:27 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: danny@panda.hilink.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199705060414.VAA11171@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "May 5, 97 09:14:57 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Archie Cobbs: [...] > > How about > > > > ipfw add 1000 reset tcp from any to foo 23 > > > > So the choices are: > > deny : be silent > > reject: send ICMP !H > > reset : send RST > > Sounds OK with me.. any body else care to comment? Yeah, I think that's good. That way you can configure it as you like. Flexability is (almost) always a good thing. Would it be hard to add something like "netreject", which would send !N, too? /Mikael