From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Mar  5 18:23:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA18588
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:23:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA18583
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA00793; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:22:52 -0800 (PST)
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2-960226-SNAP now on ftp.freebsd.org 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:20:42 PST."
             <199603060220.SAA08786@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> 
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1996 18:22:52 -0800
Message-ID: <791.826078972@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Actually, I think this is what we did last time, and I thought you
> were pulling in the ports/packages from there until you send me a mail 
> saying "Argh!  The 2.1R sysinstall is pulling in the packages from the 
> top level, and is getting the -current version!". :)

Well yes, it was, but that was mainly because we hadn't coordinated
our efforts so that everything's expectations were in line! :-)

> Why don't we just move everything down one level?  Wherever the
> top level directory is going to be (whether it's a snap or a release)

I agree totally.  I can hack sysinstall right now to expect ports
and packages dirs to be under ${RELNAME} and will do so.

					Jordan