From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 10:18:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5B216A400 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.67.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000013C45E for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: by mail.0x20.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 07CD839DB4; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:17:59 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: TooMany Secrets Message-ID: <20070617101759.GB25799@e.0x20.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make a make install without questions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:18:01 -0000 --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:10:29PM +0200, TooMany Secrets wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Excuse me if this is a estupid question, but in six years with > FreeBSD, today I haven't still an answer to this: > - If I make a "make install clean", in a port like "x11/kde3", are > there any way to make the lack of questions? Or maybe better, are > there any way to make anything like "make -y (or -Y for YES options) > install clean"? >=20 > The trouble is ports like KDE, with platform independency (more or > less cpu power), take more time because you need to stay (more or > less) in front of computer to choose and accept the port options. > I understand that you don't need this with other ports (like apache, > php, etc), for obvious reasons. But I think that with ports like > gnome2 or kde3, maybe I believe that it would be a great saving of > time. >=20 > Sorry if the question is understandable for my bad english. >=20 Hello Mr. TooMany, the portupgrade suite is what you probably want to use. You can set BATCH=3DYES or use the --batch switch which suppresses the OPTIONS menu. e.g.: portupgrade --batch -a to upgrade all ports or portinstall --batch sysutils/screen Lars --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdQpXKc512sD3afgRAmpmAJ40Z4AGAfLcaOSGqWYQ5ukqQJx23QCeML/Q JhJ9hOmop18KH7RJE0GDSUI= =EN1k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--