From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 19:41:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FAB76C6 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C737E2D3F for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s5LJfOlX078754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:41:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s5LJfNxg078751; Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:41:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:41:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Abandoning the sguil ports In-Reply-To: <60D2B80D848DAD2DD28D45F4@localhost> Message-ID: References: <60D2B80D848DAD2DD28D45F4@localhost> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:41:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:41:26 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I am the maintainer for security/sguil-server, security/sguil-sensor and > security/sguil-client. I am officially abandoning the ports. The > security/sguil-server port is not staged. The other two are. The software > has a new release out, so all three ports would need to be updated. > Furthermore, the developer has changed to github, which drives me nuts. > Finally, the ports are not even being used. They don't even have one > download according to bsdstats.org. Many people do not install or run the sysutils/bsdstats port, so the numbers are not absolute.