From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 1 21:32:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B2216A4DD for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C0643D53 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DB6DA11EB for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:32:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.internal ([10.202.2.160]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:32:06 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 1ADchWQjJYmaHhk/9BUCdF3iRKpqVgdF5HkKqPKpLVkS 1157146326 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1DA113A3 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:32:06 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:31:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200609010018.23366.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <200609012013.26435.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609012232.03876.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Anyone Using the New Free Mulberry Mail Client? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:32:07 -0000 On Friday 01 September 2006 20:40, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Friday, September 01, 2006 20:13:25 +0100 RW > > wrote: > > I didn't say it was, it was just that my specific problem was that I > > deleted the resources directory without knowing it existed. For my own > > use, I don't see the point in putting anything under /usr until there is > > a port. > > > > And it's not just the Resources directory that's important, SSL/TLS > > support is provided by a plugin. > > Thanks for pointing that out. I'll have to see if there's a way to "point > to" that directory. It's just a thought, but perhaps the linking could be handled by wrapping the binary in a shell script that verifies ~/.mulberry and the links.