From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 8 2:49:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904D837B400; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.volant.org (gate.volant.org [207.111.218.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A5143E7B; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 02:49:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patl+freebsd@volant.org) Received: from 64-144-229-193.client.dsl.net ([64.144.229.193] helo=[192.168.0.13]) by gate.volant.org with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17nyhJ-0007fI-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 02:49:41 -0700 Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 02:49:39 -0700 From: Pat Lashley To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CONCLUSION] What to do about Mozilla Message-ID: <4150422704.1031478579@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org> In-Reply-To: <1031465323.644.13.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <1031382538.46865.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <3703892704.1031440015@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org> <1031465323.644.13.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86 Demo) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========1537438186==========" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==========1537438186========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Sunday, September 08, 2002 02:08:38 AM -0400 Joe Marcus Clarke=20 wrote: > ... > This problem should be fixed now if you make sure the origin pointed to > in your +CONTENTS file is correct. Both pkg_version and portupgrade > report no problems on my mozilla laptop, or my mozilla-devel desktop. I hand edited the +CONTENTS files, but then after a cvsup and index = rebuild, portversion showed my 1.1 mozilla ports as being downrev of the 1.0_2,1=20 ports. And when I upgraded the XFree86 ports to 4.2.0 the recursive update=20 downgraded my mozilla ports back to 1.0_2,1. I had written a section outlining how I was only seeing one copy of the mozilla ports in the INDEX and what I thought the problem was; but it turns out that somehow my INDEX.db was noticably newer than the INDEX itself. I've re-cvsupp'd and re-built the indexes and now I see both. So I'll retract my claim that the split is unfinished. But now I've got the old versions installed; and don't see any clean way to upgrade to the new ones. (I do not consider manual pkg_deinstall and portinstall to be clean.) I've tweaked the origin in the +CONTENTS files; but that doesn't seem to make any difference at this point. (And is, I suspect, actually counter-productive.) I have a feeling that no matter what I do, I'll wind up with both versions installed... -Pat --==========1537438186========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9ex00ncYNbLD8wuMRAksOAJwMQ6640AnFfVNnoDUjfq46Qw03XACg6UY3 UVzyxMQijvsRxIspLW5I/M0= =nF/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========1537438186==========-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message