From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Jan 27 09:10:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E23A6E66C; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470C2163B; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id uo6so1751674pac.1; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:10:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s2VxY/aIVLAJ7/qCRA0c88Hd6G9oON4lmxl7IWzGehY=; b=ABXJB62wMfrpn44BnMLsJAGtIm56nYsUpBHDUoSDz/x+n1cH0Ozf46NgZL+3eHOEh7 Mtyg1Y8EeIOdTlUI2D2TrFqjjQS8j5eWcg+zRbxIXq5+k3AI1W1Tb2XIjCkN6iAxW+Ox HetMYhTZWxriL1rPUjvOFR4QoBHD6IswcsNaIFBlKVfjyk8a+2zHa9EmlFtW+CXgVymJ iVNSyRWM6KBleEe/AhAhlGgyfYj9GQTJjQtONEChlVVgzoTLwOfUV59EowE3lrkSnsoR bfG9m6YZBP1rGqEkusGymapLrt9CF0MoE1HG70/fdH3hs5V8zw/BDJ7IvzAaWBn4KXFJ fZPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s2VxY/aIVLAJ7/qCRA0c88Hd6G9oON4lmxl7IWzGehY=; b=IacCBHxae8gzTQ7es9UrIrPCiaElQm+ts72vszpGNFPj6uwpKkSP74LUZrHcuJWK63 keQ9T9NsfwxSwwC8qjaOTs/dtY8W3y3vuLR8E1T9WpCaAcGRMyCzFxNV43YGObOOpoMI rHWtNjC6isS4RkcpRpceS2B39TO/4l3eqLxNcHCmqhD2gYdHsMNZijJXVmwTm/YIumyL OxAQQtKrC2QKYwbVaFNu6MV/ttNQA04C1ws1wVvERn4x2oByF0JkRB5LgnqdXRwgFQjP HwE5vCiggELhMNfONHEsMpuIcXSyoavsLO1/YPYHneBwg1FVUOguHpO3NNU1WfAZCiMN rVRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORpLIlqT4VbjmFByo2CqDD/3O2N/G+kKg0z6pxqXlz2aO9H2xT3QBe4hC4y/Je1/g== X-Received: by 10.67.3.134 with SMTP id bw6mr3631107pad.154.1453885831633; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:6821:be33:19f8:f73a? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-6821-be33-19f8-f73a.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:6821:be33:19f8:f73a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fa3sm7271292pab.45.2016.01.27.01.10.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:10:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r407270 - head/ports-mgmt/portmaster References: <201601261123.u0QBNcvL091258@repo.freebsd.org> <56A86CAD.7030507@marino.st> <56A8747E.5080703@FreeBSD.org> <20160127081700.GA20812@FreeBSD.org> <56A87FCE.6080305@FreeBSD.org> <00000152824e008b-5f17d39b-fd62-427d-bf4d-d5e2c3ce6634-000000@email.amazonses.com> To: Colin Percival Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" , "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <56A8897D.3040806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:10:21 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00000152824e008b-5f17d39b-fd62-427d-bf4d-d5e2c3ce6634-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:10:32 -0000 On 27/01/2016 7:58 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 01/27/16 00:29, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> It would be nice to have something framework'ey that is less loaded than >> DEPRECATED, but more specific and consistent than your standard ECHO_MSG >> or pkg-message. Like CAUTION/ALERT/WARNING/INFORMATIONAL or similar. > > How about this? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206666 > That's a good start, but not the same as what I intended. A WARNING/ALERT ability in the framework, independent to whether or not those should be used for unmaintained ports. I personally wouldn't use them for all unmaintained ports, because each case is different, but the framework bits are valuable nonetheless. But that aside, for example, I need/want to add "WARNINGS" to py-pip (not to use pip to install python packages into the system python package directory). I want to add ALERTS to lang/python* ports that some standard library functionality are availabe in separate ports. There are many classes of things we could use this for. If you don't mind, I'd like to rephrase the summary of that issue, because I think tracking the desire for a feature is a good thing.