From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 17:06:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3781116A420; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB7C13C478; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l8MGtudS060930; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:55:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:55:56 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Ben Kaduk In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070922205156.K70319@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:55:56 +0400 (MSD) Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:06:10 -0000 On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Ben Kaduk wrote: BK> > >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s BK> > >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot BK> > >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for BK> > >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? BK> > > BK> > > As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures. BK> > BK> > The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see BK> > src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment). BK> BK> But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ? I can see in share/sgml/freebsd.ent: This is from rev 1.93 of freebsd.ent: date: 2007/08/11 19:17:41; author: bmah; state: Exp; lines: +15 -0 Add &arch.*; entities for the various architectures. These should only be used when referring to a version of FreeBSD on a specific architecture, e.g. &os;/&arch.i386;. Use other, already existing entities (such as &i386;) when talking generically about an architecture, in order to attribute trademarks correctly. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------