From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 19:18:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A74E16A417 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AD913C4D1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0F42099; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:17:55 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D242049; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:17:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0ABA84490; Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:17:54 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Vince References: <477B9B22.1090703@moneybookers.com> <477BBCC1.6020900@unsane.co.uk> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:17:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <477BBCC1.6020900@unsane.co.uk> (Vince's message of "Wed\, 02 Jan 2008 16\:33\:05 +0000") Message-ID: <8663ycvxy5.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev Subject: Re: future plans for USB stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:18:05 -0000 Vince writes: > Stefan Lambrev writes: > > What are the future plans for USB in FreeBSD? Will usb4bsd > > (http://www.turbocat.net/~hselasky/usb4bsd/) replace the current usb > > stack in FreeBSD or there is another work to improve the usb stack? > I believe this is planned to be the furture for the usb stack. Not without a lot of work. There are a number of architectural and code quality issues which the author has repeatedly refused to address. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no