From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 9 15:13:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA24338 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 15:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alaska.net (root@calvino.alaska.net [206.149.65.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA24324 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 15:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hmmm.alaska.net by alaska.net (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA17653; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 14:12:53 -0800 Message-Id: <32348683.3642@alaska.net> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 14:05:07 -0700 From: hmmm X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Subject: ppp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk equipment: all works fine under dos problem: two situations follow ... manually dialing works. dialup PPP doesn't. both cases result in the same "ifconfig -a" output; however ... "netstat -r" output is as follows: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire ====================================================================== MANUAL DIAL USING PPP's TERM COMMAND (WORKS!!!) ====================================================================== default anc-p23 UGc 12 0 tun0 localhost localhost UH 0 0 lo0 hmmm localhost UH 0 0 lo0 ====================================================================== DIALUP USING PPP's DIAL COMMAND (FAILS!!!) ====================================================================== default 206.149.120.3 UGc 3 1 tun0 localhost localhost UH 0 0 lo0 hmmm localhost UH 0 0 lo0 206.149.120.3 hmmm UH 4 0 tun0 ====================================================================== can anyone tell me what's going on? in the DIALUP case, slynx just hangs looking for my startup www page. i do SEEM to have a valid ppp connection - it bounces back in all caps. 206.149.120.3 IS my ISPs address ... my machine is "hmmm" (even though i'm probably just plain ignorant!!!) ps. is it normal to have 2 "lo" routes?