From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 2 6:35:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C69C37B71D for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 06:35:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kaltorak@quake.com.au) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id fitaaaaa for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 23:35:40 +1000 Message-ID: <3AC880F6.DB4ADCB3@quake.com.au> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 23:39:02 +1000 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Victor R. Cardona" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18 vs. FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE References: <86430000.986138943@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> <20010401173846.A19749@marx.marvic.chum> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Victor R. Cardona" wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:29:03AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > As much as I prefer FreeBSD over Linux, I think you have more proof of > > moron "installers" there; we have both FreeBSD and SuSE Linux (and I > > personally support the latter, including 7.1), and neither has any such > > problems in my experience. Both support mostly the same hardware. > > > > (SuSE and Debian go a long way toward making Linux tolerable, if not the > > quality OS that FreeBSD is.) > > I have to second that. I use SuSE on my workstations, and FreeBSD on > servers, and am happy with both. I have to totaly dissagree... Linux is crap! Not only is its development totaly disorganised, let alone the fact there is billions of dists, its really only a toy... There is no way they can make linux even close to tolerable! FreeBSD everywhere! Even slashdot is moving to FreeBSD cos they had enough of linux! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message