From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 24 11:05:04 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978B9454
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F222BDE
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1WzOX8-000O3G-MG; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:05:02 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:05:02 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: spamassassin-3.4.0_11
Message-ID: <20140624110502.GU2586@home.opsec.eu>
References: <F868D930-1D30-478C-A5EC-2F0F7653E926@webweaving.org>
 <20140624100737.GT2586@home.opsec.eu>
 <B907A9B7-66DD-4441-844F-F0CC7EF6C611@webweaving.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B907A9B7-66DD-4441-844F-F0CC7EF6C611@webweaving.org>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:04 -0000

Hi!

> >> Still trying to get to the bottom of it - but seeing issues after
> >> todays pkg update.
[...]
> >> also hits us.

> Meanwhile - got to the bottom if it - and it needs indeed said patch.

Yes, but 3.4.0_11 should have it, that's the point of 191101 ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         6 years to go !