From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 18 18:19:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CB716A401 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD8113C45B for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 74218 invoked from network); 18 May 2007 14:19:10 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 18 May 2007 14:19:10 -0400 Message-ID: <464DEE1E.70803@queue.to> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:19:10 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: me@georgedonnelly.com References: <10687376.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <10687376.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Static Routes Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:19:13 -0000 georgedonnelly wrote: > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 0.0.0.1 UGS 0 154237 em0 > 0.0.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 em0 > 0.0.0.1 00:d0:03:15:7c:0a UHLW 2 0 em0 1155 > 0.0.0.40 00:30:48:88:d9:98 UHLW 1 41787 em0 1198 > 0.0.0.83 00:30:48:76:84:ac UHLW 1 3708 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 77453 lo0 > > (real ips obscured) I find obscuration particularly with zeros a mind game because that first one is a network address and it adds needless confusion but set that aside... From the routing table it's clear that your /24 is on the same ethernet segment and if it is, which should be apparent from a traceroute, it is already doing direct routing and you don't need to do anything. If you traceroute from one server to the other one it will in the most common scenario indicate if they're routing without touching your colo.