From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 13:05:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A8216A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orhi.sarenet.es (orhi.sarenet.es [192.148.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA7B43D1D for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (unknown [212.81.200.214]) by orhi.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3841A7A30E6 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:05:50 +0200 (MEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40@209.112.4.2> References: <6.0.3.0.0.20040420125557.06b10d48@209.112.4.2> <6.0.3.0.0.20040420144001.0723ab80@209.112.4.2> <200404201332.40827.dr@kyx.net> <20040421111003.GB19640@lum.celabo.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421121715.04547510@209.112.4.2> <20040421165454.GB20049@lum.celabo.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040421132605.0901bb40@209.112.4.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <48FCF8AA-93CF-11D8-9C50-000393C94468@sarenet.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Borja Marcos Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:05:49 +0200 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) Subject: Re: Other possible protection against RST/SYN attacks (was Re: TCP RST attack X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:05:52 -0000 > Are there any "bad things" that can happen by doing this ? Well, not every BGP sessions are established between directly connected interfaces. This would not work with "multi-hop BGP" sessions :-) Borja.