From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 12 1:24:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A013D37B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:24:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 85684317C; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:24:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:24:38 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: Julian Elischer Cc: The Babbler , John Sellens , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking - really sysmouse complaints Message-ID: <20010312092438.B1402@tao.org.uk> References: <200103112208.f2BM88L85365@gc0.generalconcepts.com> <20010311221123.B1541@tao.org.uk> <3AABF9DF.5E3C6E1F@babbleon.org> <20010311222703.C1541@tao.org.uk> <3AAC221F.1731699F@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AAC221F.1731699F@elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:10:55PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:10:55PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > >=20 > > I don't know if you're using bridging or not... I've had problem today > > with vmware and bridging and it was because the external interface (aue0 > > in my case) wasn't in promiscious mode for some reason! I managed to > > fake it by running a 'tcpdump -i aue0' in the background. I'm sure > > there's an easier way to put the interface into promiscious mode. I'm > > not sure what it is though. >=20 > ngctl msg aue0: setpromisc 1 Magic ;) In my case it looks like the aue0 wasn't coming up before the rc.d/vmware.sh script was setting up the netgraph bits. That's fixed now but it's certainly good to know this. BTW, a number of times I've wanted to back the netgraph config out so I assumed that I could do an 'ngctl rmhook nodename' where the nodenames come from 'ngctl list'. Although the command doesn't complain it doesn't remove the node though. I'm slightly baffled. What's the official way? Joe --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqsldUACgkQXVIcjOaxUBaccgCfS776KuMeWzGcXhY4cYlakK2A UmkAoJBEs8uX2+Zn6SCopUVRS/ypOvKM =b9rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message