From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 17 17:59:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B5F106566C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:59:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk)
Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk
	[IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775768FC17
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:59:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6]
	helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk)
	by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>)
	id 1RyS59-0001R3-Ej; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:58:55 +0000
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.76
	(FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>)
	id 1RyS59-0001ek-Eb; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:58:55 +0000
To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <4F3E89E3.3060608@quip.cz>
Message-Id: <E1RyS59-0001ek-Eb@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:58:55 +0000
Cc: wblock@wonkity.com, mandrews@bit0.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
	freebsd@jdc.parodius.com
Subject: Re: New BSD Installer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:59:24 -0000

> Yes it does? Am I the only one person on the whole earth seeing the big 
> difference in easy setup of mirroring two drives instead of many 
> individual partitions?

Sorry, I wasnt suggesting that you should always mirror
the indiviudual partititons - just I happen to do that where
I am mixing ZFS and gmirror. Obviosuly you dont want to create
lots of little mirrors if you dont have to. But even with
one mirror, you can mirror a big partiton covering the whole
drive, and then carve that up with bsdlabel. No need to ever mirror
the actual raw discs, and it works with GPT.

-pete.