From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 15:21:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE7016A4CE; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:21:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8257443D69; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7VFKtpi071605; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:20:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)i7VFKscE071602; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:20:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:20:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20040831150801.GA34264@ip.net.ua> Message-ID: <20040831091908.E59291@pooker.samsco.org> References: <20040831145833.GA33987@ip.net.ua> <76429.1093964750@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040831150801.GA34264@ip.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: current@freebsd.org cc: peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /coda/coda_fbsd.c:215: error: `NVCODA' undeclared when building kernel. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:21:19 -0000 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > The problem is that NVCODA is not defined for the coda module. > > > > This is a fallout from peter@'s config(8) work. > > > Yes, but my fix to sys/modules/coda/Makefile was supposed to fix it. Both the coda and coda5 modules needed fixing. I fixed coda5 and did a successful 'make kernel' afterwards. It would be nice if the coda code was actually fixed to not need NVCODA at all. Scott