From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 27 09:40:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FDAFF2 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E235222 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2R9eIC8024177 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196326] rubygem framework bug : building occurs in stage phase Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:40:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196326 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- I took a look at ${PREFIX}/lib/ruby/${ruby version}/rubygems/installer.rb Currently the extension building is part of the installer function, and there is no setting to make it work differently. However, I think it would be rather straightforward to add a new argument, e.g. "extensions-only=true" that would alter what the install routine does. So basically the idea would be to add "install" in the do-build with the "extension-only=true" argument set in the Mk/bsd.ruby.mk file. I think it's possible to make rubygems behave properly. I don't know ruby at all but I could probably figure this out in one sitting. I would think that somebody that actually knows ruby can do it faster. Who is the rubygem guru? or core team members? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.