From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Wed Jan 27 09:59:27 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF69A6FC46;
 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24771311;
 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id DE6471982; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:59:27 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Martin Wilke <miwi.fbsd@gmail.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>,
 "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r407270 - head/ports-mgmt/portmaster
Message-ID: <20160127095927.GA64137@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201601261123.u0QBNcvL091258@repo.freebsd.org>
 <CAFY+yEkOv9-JaJv45WF-GzTxOiFh6k8sZ4rysUS5xTZs=rWNrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <56A86CAD.7030507@marino.st> <56A8747E.5080703@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160127081700.GA20812@FreeBSD.org> <56A87FCE.6080305@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160127084230.GA28230@FreeBSD.org> <56A88489.5020507@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160127093601.GA54242@FreeBSD.org> <56A893D9.8000504@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56A893D9.8000504@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:59:28 -0000

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:54:33PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 27/01/2016 8:36 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Right, and it does way "may be", not "will [eventually] be" or something.
> > Yet every time someone puts a DEPRECATED without EXPIRATION_DATE, someone
> > else will ask why is that.
> 
> 'may be' in this context means 'can be'

OK, still does not imply that it will evicted, while EXPIRATION_DATE does.

I prefer software that says forever (well, as long as the Ports Tree and
FreeBSD themselves).  Unconditionally EOLing ports on their inception is
IMHO atrocious (in reply to adjacent email).

./danfe