From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 15:37:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EAB1065679 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D818FC0A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m6MFbkuk031027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:37:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4885FECA.6000502@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:37:46 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <20080630040103.94730.qmail@mailgate.gta.com> <486A45AB.2080609@freebsd.org> <487EC62A.3070301@freebsd.org> <20080721085325.B57089@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4884A956.5060108@freebsd.org> <20080721180626.V57089@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20080721180626.V57089@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-Rhyolite-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net, Larry Baird Subject: Re: FreeBSD NAT-T patch integration [CFR/CFT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:37:50 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Sam Leffler wrote: > > Hi Sam, > >>> We are still missing other things I think not mentioned elswhere like >>> partial checksum recalculation. >> >> Please send me your specific issues; I haven't seen any comments >> about "partial checksum recalculations". > > So what has kept you from reading the RFCs for the patch you were > working on? "It works for me" does not mean "It's right and all done". > Nothing; so far as I can see your comments are irrelevant and unless you're willing to spell out the specific concerns you have I'm not giving them much weight. As I said when I got involved in this discussion I've wanted NA-T support in FreeBSD for a long time. I've tried several ways to make this happen but now am actively putting my time into making it happen. If you don't want to participate that's fine. Otherwise please provide constructive help. Again, remember this work is going in HEAD and all the changes are conditionally compiled. Sam