From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 03:21:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A024DF; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 03:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4AB12770; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 03:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.192.25] (dhcp-108-170-169-12.cable.user.start.ca [108.170.169.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by apnoea.adamw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEAC611F8D2; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: spamassassin-3.4.0_11 From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:21:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6067D663-C561-4EFF-B087-D6D557526CE6@adamw.org> References: <53AAF3C5.6010404@webtent.org> To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, adamw@FreeBSD.org, Robert Fitzpatrick X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 03:21:06 -0000 On 26 Jun, 2014, at 11:58, Dirk-Willem van Gulik = wrote: > Op 26 jun. 2014, om 16:49 heeft Adam Weinberger het = volgende geschreven: >> On 25 Jun, 2014, at 12:07, Robert Fitzpatrick = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7057 >>>>=20 >>> I am setting up a new server and ran into the same DNS issue while = testing Spamassasin 3.4. I applied the above patch and it seems to have = corrected the issue, not getting the eval failed any longer. Strange = this is, my version of p5-Net-DNS is 0.73 and the bug reports this only = started happening with 0.76. >>=20 >> This issue was fixed a week ago in r358624. If your p5-Net-DNS is = still 0.73 then you need to update your ports tree --- that hasn=92t = been the current version for over 5 months. >=20 > I updated to below version - but did need the Spam Assassin patch = earlier discussed. =20 >=20 > That does make sense I guess; as it is the change in the API of = p5-Net-DNS-0.76 that drives the need for the patch to Spam Assassin. As = to have the latter follow the name server API change. >=20 > Dw >=20 > p5-Net-DNS-0.76 > spamassassin-3.4.0_10 Both those ports are outdated. That SpamAssassin patch was applied to = the FreeBSD port a week ago, and p5-Net-DNS has also been updated since. [root@apnoea ~] pkg info spamassassin p5-Net-DNS spamassassin-3.4.0_11 p5-Net-DNS-0.77 Have a read through = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html= for information on how to keep your ports tree up-to-date, and how to = update installed ports/packages. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org