From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 17:40:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9930F1AA for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569EB8A2 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Tuo12-000PR6-5s; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:40:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:40:08 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Regarding portscout Message-ID: <20130114174008.GF8239@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:40:13 -0000 Hi! > In this case, should a maintainer wait until the previous PR is taken > care of? I didn't read information regarding this in the handbook. The maintainer should not wait for the previous PR. He can update his PR with a new patch for the new version, so that the committer can just commit the newer patch. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 7 years to go !