From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:20:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0412C106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE208FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280239F95 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:20:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:20:26 -0000 How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)? I noticed that in the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow to avoid more such user intervention? Thanks