From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 18:37:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A31316A404 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 18:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayve@sfsu.edu) Received: from iron1.sfsu.edu (iron1.sfsu.edu [130.212.10.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017D013C448 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 18:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayve@sfsu.edu) Received: from smtp01.sfsu.edu ([130.212.10.100]) by iron1.sfsu.edu with ESMTP; 17 May 2007 11:37:17 -0700 X-onepass: IPPSC X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CABw9TEaC1Apk/2dsb2JhbAA Received: from libra.sfsu.edu ([130.212.10.238]) by mail05a.sfsu.edu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0) with ESMTP id 2007051711371628-368 ; Thu, 17 May 2007 11:37:16 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: KAYVEN RIESE To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <464B1D6A.1040809@samsco.org> <44tzubr4u6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on MAIL05a/SERVERS/SFSU(Release 7.0|August 18, 2005) at 05/17/2007 11:37:16, Serialize by Router on SMTP01/SERVERS/SFSU(Release 7.0.2FP1HF155 | March 20, 2007) at 05/17/2007 11:37:16, Serialize complete at 05/17/2007 11:37:16 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:37:18 -0000 On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Please don't top-post. > > KAYVEN RIESE writes: > >> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade >> comamnd, just verifying > > Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on > pango being unable to use the new version. > > Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any > other issues you need to take special action for at the same time. > this guy seems to disagree jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error messages from xfce. If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed either. Ricardo's comment (in your parallel thread on the freebsd-stable mailing list) about the gettext upgrade is probably relevant as well.