From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 12 23:49:47 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAFAEE2;
 Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D588F18;
 Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:49:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBC8E7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [93.203.200.231]) (authenticated bits=128)
 by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1CNrR3V088186;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:53:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
 by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t1CNnW2R058294;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:49:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t1CNnD43027915;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:49:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Message-Id: <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 +0100."
 <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:49:13 +0100
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:49:47 -0000

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha=
> t I
> want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old =
.................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> make
> =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> 
> Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bapt

I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
remove old make without notice ?

In FreeBSD-9.3 :
  bmake is not default, merely there
	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  518032 Nov  5 16:58 /usr/bin/bmake*
	-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  453176 Nov  5 16:58 /usr/bin/make*
  & man make has No Warning people should migrate to bmake.

FreeBSD-10.0
  Has Only one /usr/bin/*make (& no make.old)
  & No warning that it's a new make called bmake or what if any differences
  might be from make in 9.

cd ~ ; find . -type f -name Makefile | wc -l	# 739

Use of FreeBSD is not merely to rebuild FreeBSD, but to support users who
want to trust FreeBSD to provide predictable functional stability.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
 Indent previous with "> ".  Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script.
 Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.