From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:28:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87DE16A4BF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 03:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.va.com.au (shiraz.va.com.au [203.15.106.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FFE143FE0 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 03:28:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesse@va.com.au) Received: (qmail 23364 invoked by uid 85); 5 Sep 2003 10:28:42 -0000 Received: from jesse@va.com.au by shiraz.va.com.au by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.52. spamassassin: 2.20. Clear:. Processed in 0.326578 secs); 05 Sep 2003 10:28:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.1.30?) (150.101.125.197) by mail.va.com.au with SMTP; 5 Sep 2003 10:28:42 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jesse%va.com.au@mail.va.com.au Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200309050940.H859EIDV006281@asarian-host.net> References: <20030903162614.GB38375@ei.bzerk.org> <200309050940.H859EIDV006281@asarian-host.net> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:28:17 +1000 To: Mark , "Ruben de Groot" From: jesse reynolds Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: jesse@va.com.au cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID1 is DEGRADED, but which disk is faulty? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 10:28:44 -0000 At 9:41 +0000 5/9/2003, Mark wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "jesse reynolds" >To: "Ruben de Groot" >Cc: >Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:08 AM >Subject: Re: RAID1 is DEGRADED, but which disk is faulty? > > >> Is it safe to shut it down and see what the Promise firmware >> is saying? Or will i then lose the ability to tell which disk is >> good and which has problems? > >I use an ASUS A7V333 board, with the onboard Promise PDC 20276 RAID >controller (ATA133). Last summer I had the exact problem as you: > >ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: DEGRADED > >As the BIOS does a scan on the array at startup, going into the setup, it >was immediately clear which drive was failing; and I could just rebuild from >the BIOS (after putting in a new disk). > >There is also a "manual" test you could try. Simply open up your casing, and >feel which drive is cold. :) Because after the array was degraded, ad6, in >my case, was turned off. > >FreeBSD, btw, was able to boot off the degraded array as well. And, I mean, >why not even? That is the whole purpose of RAID1. The warning messages kinda >look scary, and make you feel your system is on the verge of collapse. But >in reality, you just have a system running on one hard disk, like millions >of other computers in the world. :) Cool, so you think it's safe to reboot the machine? The promise controller will know which disk is the 'up to date' one will it? (In the event that both drives are actually OK but the mirrir has 'broken' for some reason, perhaps they were never properly built in the first place - this is the first time I've run atacontrol to check the status!) Thankyou Jesse -- ::: Jesse Reynolds +61 (0)414 669 790 ::: AIM - jessedreynolds ::: ::: Virtual Artists Pty Ltd, Adelaide ::: http://www.va.com.au :::