From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 19:39:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3994116A4CE; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:39:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D4F43D5C; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5FDA511C0; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:39:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:39:53 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kirill Ponomarew Message-ID: <20050127193953.GA22394@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501271827.j0RIRfeP052265@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050127202704.1241613c.oliver@FreeBSD.org> <20050127193105.GA22233@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050127193541.GC57021@voodoo.oberon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050127193541.GC57021@voodoo.oberon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Kris Kennaway cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Oliver Lehmann cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11 Makefile ports/x11/Terminal Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:39:55 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 08:35:41PM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:31:05AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > I thought we were preferring lowercased port names? > > >=20 > > > Even if the author of that software have choseen to write and use it > > > uppercase? > >=20 > > This is discussed in the porters' handbook. >=20 > We're currently living with 77 uppercased PORTNAMEs' though. =2E6% of the ports collection isn't exactly an endorsement :-) Ideally, (most of) these should be fixed to conform to the naming conventions. Kris --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB+UOJWry0BWjoQKURAtspAKCmVq7AzCDRW8Mef3XgASUTVAT4LwCdGHnW +OQazdlbfIMyXpR66A3BkGY= =oIYz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--