From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 17:20:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3BB16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:20:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DBA43D1F for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j13HKOV1099441 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:20:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j13HKOI8099440; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:20:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:20:24 GMT Message-Id: <200502031720.j13HKOI8099440@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Adrian Filipi Subject: Re: docs/77024: typo/bad grammar in indent(1) manpage X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adrian Filipi List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:20:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/77024; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adrian Filipi To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/77024: typo/bad grammar in indent(1) manpage Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:17:04 -0500 (EST) Sounds good to me. Better than the original. Adrian -- [ adrian@ubergeeks.com ] On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > % --- indent.1.orig Thu Feb 3 00:35:20 2005 > % +++ indent.1 Thu Feb 3 00:36:37 2005 > % @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ > % .Pp > % .Dl indent *.c > % .Pp > % -to the shell in an attempt to indent all the > % +To the shell this is an attempt to indent all the > % .Em C > % programs in a directory. > % -This is probably a bug, not a feature. > % +It is probably a bug, not a feature. > > This shows too little context from the original manpage. Reading both the > preceding paragraph and the one that follows the displayed material we see: > > % A common mistake that often causes grief is typing: > % > % indent *.c > % > % to the shell in an attempt to indent all the C programs in a > % directory. This is probably a bug, not a feature. > > If you read both these paragraphs as one sentence, it probably > makes more sense. I agree it looks a bit confusing though. > > We can probably rewrite this part as: > > % A common mistake is to try to indent all the C programs in a > % directory by typing: > % > % indent *.c > % > % This is probably a bug, not a feature. >