From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jun 3 22:54:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4994A15417 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 22:54:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA23542; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 07:54:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id HAA81886; Fri, 4 Jun 1999 07:54:31 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 07:54:30 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Brett Taylor Cc: Joseph Scott , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Slashdot testing out FreeBSD box Message-ID: <19990604075430.C80950@bitbox.follo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Brett Taylor on Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 03:57:10PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 03:57:10PM -0600, Brett Taylor wrote: > If you read the responses, which is always a dangerous endeavor :-), > you'll see people saying that images and ads are appearing much faster now > too. They mentioned other tweaks, but I'm glad to see they're not having > obvious troubles w/ the box which some would blame on FreeBSD (even if > they weren't caused by it). Well, the ads are now served by doubleclick instead of adfu, so I don't think we can really take the credit for that... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message