From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 17:40:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FE716A423 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1650343D60 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jANHeNSK079515 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jANHeNDq079514; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:23 GMT Message-Id: <200511231740.jANHeNDq079514@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:40:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/89415; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: vd@datamax.bg Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:33:44 +0100 --=-3G5del8496gJVzdqNeCG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vasil Dimov p=ED=B9e v st 23. 11. 2005 v 19:29 +0200: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:51:58PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Vasil Dimov pe v st 23. 11. 2005 v 18:48 +0200: > >=20 > > > Other solution is to leave the things as they are and use the widespr= ead > > > "do nothing" strategy :-) After all there are more important things t= o > > > bother with, than the SHA256 sums. > >=20 > > Sounds best. > >=20 > > Also, could your tool be tailored to insert the lines to distinfo where > > 'make makesum' would insert them, not on the end? > >=20 >=20 > Hmmz, I am little confused: if "do nothing" ``Sounds best'' why do you > want me to change the sha256 checksums generation tool? Tool is useful. The patch in the PR isn't, because work needed to commit it is greater than work needed to recreate it on working copy... Actually I knocked together a simple script that checkouts all ports of given maintainer without SHA256 sums and run 'make makesum' on them... Expect some megacommits soon. :) --=20 Pav Lucistnik I can't do that, that would make sense. --=-3G5del8496gJVzdqNeCG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDhKf4ntdYP8FOsoIRAveSAJ9bXptm8DPsRatv2TCvKgNbiX7CXgCgikIR Z19ZWz7AsJffsVcE8KiUOYE= =KH/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3G5del8496gJVzdqNeCG--