From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 20 22:02:07 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 09C4016A4B3; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0D62143FBF; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8L524GA019811;
	Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:02:04 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:02:05 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030920.230205.88963117.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: deischen@freebsd.org, eischen@vigrid.com
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
References: <20030920175306.Q9576@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: DougB@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: h@schmalzbauer.de
Subject: Re: ports and -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 05:02:07 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 05:02:07 -0000

In message: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210041350.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
            Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes:
: I'd like to see some barking up the other tree.  Why should fixes
: to unbreak ports be held up by the freeze?

Because the ports folks do not want random changes going into the tree
right now given that they have enough build problems on 4.9 related to
GNOME.

Warner