From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 04:37:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85CD106567C for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [220.233.188.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FD68FC0A for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9L4biQv091118; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:37:44 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:37:44 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Fabian Keil In-Reply-To: <20081020200544.4d819d66@fabiankeil.de> Message-ID: <20081021153627.B4254@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <200810171530.45570.joao@matik.com.br> <200810200837.40451.joao@matik.com.br> <20081020132208.GA3847@icarus.home.lan> <200810201507.30778.joao@matik.com.br> <20081020171516.GA8551@icarus.home.lan> <20081020200544.4d819d66@fabiankeil.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: constant zfs data corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:37:51 -0000 On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Fabian Keil wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:07:30PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote: > > > On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote: > > > > > Also, do you not think it's a little odd that the only data > > > > corruption occurring for you are related to RRDtool? > > > > > > this yes I think is suspitious > > > > Chuck's probably spot-on with regards to explaining why this is. > > Something to keep in mind is that RRDtool has a history of bugs, so I > > wouldn't be surprised if the issue turned out to be there. It's really > > too bad we have no decent, actively-maintained alternatives to RRDtool. > > Bugs in RRDtool shouldn't cause ZFS data corruption. Beat me to it, but I was going to say "couldn't" .. cheers, Ian