From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 18:01:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C917C16A469 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from galain.elvandar.org (galain.elvandar.org [217.148.169.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8061013C469 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost.we-dare.net ([127.0.0.1] helo=galain.elvandar.org) by galain.elvandar.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1J3DhD-000916-Sa; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:47:31 +0100 Received: from 194.74.82.3 (SquirrelMail authenticated user remko) by galain.elvandar.org with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:47:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <26512.194.74.82.3.1197650851.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <20071214163719.CF27C13C448@mx1.freebsd.org> References: <20071212065822.4F6A313C457@mx1.freebsd.org> <475F9560.40703@FreeBSD.org> <20071212090407.8B26613C478@mx1.freebsd.org> <47600358.3010909@FreeBSD.org> <20071214163719.CF27C13C448@mx1.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:47:31 +0100 (CET) From: "Remko Lodder" To: "W. D." User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, timur@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: "Remote Code Execution... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:01:04 -0000 On Fri, December 14, 2007 5:37 pm, W. D. wrote: > At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: >>W. D. wrote: > Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated > in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is > 3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports > version stuck at 3.0.26a_2,1? I figure you have some spare time to help maintain these issues? As you might be aware we are in the process of having a release cycle and we are investigating which ports need to be upgraded to do this properly without breaking an entire release. THAT takes a little including rebuilding ports. > > If there are fixes available already on the Samba websites, > why can't they be integrated into the ports? They can, we are working on it Just have a little patience > > I neet to get a fileserver going right away. I would like > to use Samba. Perhaps I should just load Windows on it? Ah yes make my day and make it happen, just dont come back whining in case it does not do what you would have expected or something. If you need the thing urgently install it manually and be done with it. > > It seems to me that leaving a port broken like this is > very "unprofessional". I would expect more from the folks > maintaing FreeBSD. Exactly; please go to the Windows team and install windows on your machine to get more professional support, including paying for everything You tend to forget that we are volunteers and cannot handle it all; if you know better, please step up and work on it else stfu. > > When is it going to be fixed? Does "soon" mean this century? > This year? When? > For you i'll make an exception for 2010... For every other person, we will have this incorporated ASAP. > > > > > Start Here to Find It Fast!™ -> > http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ > $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ > > -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News